At the conclusion of the previous year, a team from Japan uncovered that there was more to mechanochemical cross-coupling reactions driven by nickel salts than initially thought. Their publication indicated that the wear of stainless steel during ball milling activated nickel catalysts \u2013 without requiring mechanoredox catalysts, piezoelectric materials, or standard reductants \u2013 thereby challenging the belief that the materials involved in ball milling, like stainless steel and zirconia, are nonreactive.<\/p>\n
\u201cIn nickel-catalyzed C\u2013N cross coupling, a reductant is typically essential,\u201d says Julia Khusnutdinova, a coordination and catalysis chemist at Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology in Japan, who headed the research team. \u201cI began discussing with my student what the reductant could be \u2013 he suggested some wild possibilities, like it could be hydroxyl radicals and I said: \u2018No, no, you have stainless steel \u2013 it could just be stainless steel\u2019.\u201d<\/p>\n
Consequently, her student began to explore further; he assessed abrasion and conducted in-depth studies using transmission electron microscopy, along with x-ray diffraction and various spectroscopy techniques, to determine the precise cause.<\/p>\n
Their research indicated that the mechanical abrasion was enhanced by additives typically utilized in mechanochemistry, such as Celite or barium titanate. Their findings also disclosed the generation of iron- and chromium-coated particles during ball milling that likely act as reductants activating the nickel salts that catalyze C\u2013N cross-coupling or cross-electrophile C\u2013C coupling reactions.<\/p>\n
Khusnutdinova and her team assert that their results serve as a \u2018cautionary tale\u2019 for the scientific community, illustrating that the stainless steel vessels and balls frequently employed in mechanochemistry are not necessarily passive participants in any reaction.<\/p>\n
\u201cThe comparison of various materials should become far more common, because even now, I observe some publications where reactions are solely conducted in stainless steel, while other materials are left uninvestigated,\u201d she notes.<\/p>\n
Surprising reaction outcomes due to seemingly \u2018inert\u2019 reaction materials, or unexpected contaminants, are not a novel occurrence. Over time, Chemistry World has documented instances of glassware enhancing the Katritzky reaction and facilitating reactions during the Miller\u2013Urey \u2018primordial soup\u2019 experiment; plasticware leaching substances into biological examinations; and contaminated stirrer bars resulting in \u2018phantom\u2019 catalyst-free reactions.<\/p>\n
Metal-free Suzuki coupling?<\/p>\n
In the early 2000s, Nicholas Leadbeater, a synthetic chemist at the University of Connecticut in the US, experienced a somewhat disheartening incident while researching microwave-assisted reactions, particularly Suzuki couplings.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe had conducted extensive palladium-catalyzed studies of these reactions, and we realized that we could utilize our microwave to safely and effectively heat our reaction mixture to 150\u00b0C,\u201d he recalls. \u201cWe discovered that we could carry out these reactions in water, which was incredibly exciting. We could implement just a small amount of the palladium catalyst, but it still remained in the reaction mixture.\u201d<\/p>\n
Leadbeater mentioned that he and his team subsequently pondered if there existed a more economical method using copper salts. \u201cLo and behold, we managed to perform these coupling reactions and achieved impressive yields of the product. This left us astonished\u2026 we completed this with a wide range of substrates and prepared it for publication.\u201d<\/p>\n
Nonetheless, at the final moment they opted to conduct one last trial.<\/p>\n
\u201cI entered the lab and instructed the student to proceed with that\u2026 but in their eagerness to finish this last reaction, they neglected to add the copper, and the reaction was successful. We obtained the same yield.\u201d<\/p>\n
They believed they had stumbled upon a metal-free Suzuki coupling reaction.<\/p>\n
\u201cWe thought\u2026 \u2018this is revolutionary\u2019, because there\u2019s no need for any metal salts,\u201d Leadbeater states. \u201cThis offers benefits as it is more cost-effective, but also, if you are involved in the pharmaceutical sector, one requirement is with removing the metal from your product before converting it into a drug molecule for human consumption.\u201d<\/p>\n
Following the publication of their paper, Leadbeater was invited to present at numerous prestigious conferences, and prominent figures in chemistry began proposing potential mechanisms to account for their findings.<\/p>\n
It was at that juncture that the chemistry department in the UK where Leadbeater worked was shut down, prompting his move to the US. However, upon his arrival, he found that they could not replicate any of the metal-free reactions.<\/p>\n
\u201cNothing was successful. And this plunged me into a state of sheer panic\u2026 our fundamental discovery was failing!\u201d exclaims Leadbeater.<\/p>\n
After conducting some investigative work, they identified that the sodium carbonate base used in the reactions in the UK contained approximately 50 parts per billion of palladium, whereas in the US, it did not.<\/p>\n
\u201cThus, what we actually uncovered in the UK was a Suzuki coupling reaction, but one that is carried out with ultra-low levels of palladium \u2013 it<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"
At the conclusion of the previous year, a team from Japan uncovered that there was more to mechanochemical cross-coupling reactions driven by nickel salts than initially thought. Their publication indicated that the wear of stainless steel during ball milling activated nickel catalysts \u2013 without requiring mechanoredox catalysts, piezoelectric materials, or standard reductants \u2013 thereby challenging […]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":2,"featured_media":371845,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"Default","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[174],"class_list":["post-371844","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-source-chemistryworld-com"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wolfscientific.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371844","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wolfscientific.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wolfscientific.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wolfscientific.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/2"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wolfscientific.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=371844"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/wolfscientific.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/371844\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wolfscientific.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/371845"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wolfscientific.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=371844"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wolfscientific.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=371844"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wolfscientific.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=371844"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}