{"id":372665,"date":"2026-05-21T14:16:04","date_gmt":"2026-05-21T14:16:04","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/wolfscientific.com\/?p=372665"},"modified":"2026-05-21T14:16:04","modified_gmt":"2026-05-21T14:16:04","slug":"study-discovers-ammonia-pollution-in-water-microdroplets","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/wolfscientific.com\/?p=372665","title":{"rendered":"Study Discovers Ammonia Pollution in Water Microdroplets"},"content":{"rendered":"<p>**New Mass Spectrometry Studies Question Water Microdroplet Chemistry**<\/p>\n<p>Recent studies by Ryan Julian and his team at the University of California, Riverside, challenge the previously accepted idea that water microdroplets can spontaneously produce hydroxyl radicals. This investigation indicates that trace ammonia contamination may be the cause of signals that were formerly identified as reactive hydroxyl species.<\/p>\n<p>Water microdroplets, around 10\u03bcm in diameter, naturally exist in the atmosphere or can be created using various methods. The discourse over spontaneous ion generation within these droplets began in 2019, when Richard Zare of Stanford University asserted that these microdroplets could generate hydrogen peroxide. Through mass spectrometry, Zare identified an ion at m\/z 36, interpreting it as a hydroxyl radical, backed by similar experiments with radical scavengers such as melatonin and caffeine.<\/p>\n<p>However, not everyone agreed with Zare&#8217;s claims. Evan Williams of UC Berkeley pointed out the discussion&#8217;s importance in the scientific arena. Julian, originally unaware of the debate, opted to explore it further after coming across the subject at a conference.<\/p>\n<p>Julian and Aidan Purcell conducted their experiments utilizing gas flow nebulization on LC\/MS grade water, noting a peak at m\/z 36. Nevertheless, collision-induced dissociation (CID) of this ion revealed a peak at m\/z 18, correlating to NH4+, instead of the anticipated H3O+. A subsequent absence of a peak at m\/z 37 lent additional support to the interpretation of protonated ammonia rather than water.<\/p>\n<p>In contrast, when water was electrosprayed with voltage, the expected m\/z 37 peak emerged, with CID confirming the existence of H3O+. Repeated experiments using 18O water consistently displayed m\/z 36 and m\/z 38 peaks, linking to [NH4 + H2O] rather than hydroxyl radicals.<\/p>\n<p>According to Williams, ammonia contamination likely accounts for these findings, as ambient settings have ammonia from breath and skin emissions. Himanshu Mishra from King Abdullah University of Science and Technology endorses Julian&#8217;s conclusions, labeling them as rational and authoritative.<\/p>\n<p>While past investigations have contested Zare&#8217;s theory, Julian&#8217;s research contributes significant evidence to the ongoing discussion, underscoring the necessity of publishing varied scientific viewpoints to further knowledge. Despite possible resistance, Julian maintains that his findings are crucial for scientific advancement. Zare opted not to comment on these recent developments.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>**New Mass Spectrometry Studies Question Water Microdroplet Chemistry** Recent studies by Ryan Julian and his team at the University of California, Riverside, challenge the previously accepted idea that water microdroplets can spontaneously produce hydroxyl radicals. This investigation indicates that trace ammonia contamination may be the cause of signals that were formerly identified as reactive hydroxyl [&hellip;]<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":372666,"comment_status":"closed","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"Default","format":"standard","meta":{"footnotes":""},"categories":[1],"tags":[174],"class_list":["post-372665","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-uncategorized","tag-source-chemistryworld-com"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/wolfscientific.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/372665","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/wolfscientific.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/wolfscientific.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wolfscientific.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wolfscientific.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcomments&post=372665"}],"version-history":[{"count":0,"href":"https:\/\/wolfscientific.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/posts\/372665\/revisions"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wolfscientific.com\/index.php?rest_route=\/wp\/v2\/media\/372666"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/wolfscientific.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fmedia&parent=372665"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wolfscientific.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Fcategories&post=372665"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/wolfscientific.com\/index.php?rest_route=%2Fwp%2Fv2%2Ftags&post=372665"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}