“Text Abbreviations’ Usage May Cause Messages to Appear Less Genuine, Research Reveals”

## New Research Indicates That Text Abbreviations Like “IDK” May Hinder Communication

### Summary:
A large-scale study involving more than 5,300 participants across 37 countries indicates that the use of text abbreviations, including “IDK” and “GOAT,” can make the sender appear insincere. Published in the *Journal of Experimental Psychology: General* on November 14, 2024, the findings reveal that individuals who utilize abbreviations are less inclined to receive extended responses, potentially jeopardizing crucial social connections, especially in personal discussions.

[Read the complete study here: 10.1037/xge0001684](https://doi.org/10.1037/xge0001684)

—

### The Unseen Price of Short Forms

Abbreviations such as “LOL,” “IDK,” and “TBH” are frequently used to enhance the speed and efficiency of texting. In fact, 99% of the study’s participants indicated that they employ text abbreviations. Nevertheless, research led by David Fang from Stanford University suggests that these shortcuts may adversely affect how texters are perceived.

“We were interested in whether abbreviations, which have become so prevalent, might create a sense of closeness because of their informal and relaxed nature,” remarks Fang. “However, to our surprise, we discovered they actually triggered more negative perceptions overall.”

The study explored various communication contexts, ranging from casual conversations on Discord to online dating environments like Tinder. Notably, participants who employed abbreviations generally received shorter and fewer replies. Specifically, in dating situations, those using abbreviations faced diminished chances of obtaining contact details from their chat partners.

This implies that while abbreviations may expedite communication, they could undermine the effectiveness of interactions where sincerity and emotional involvement are imperative, such as in personal or relationship-building situations.

—

### Age Isn’t the Only Factor

Interestingly, the presumption that the younger, tech-savvy demographic would show a preference for abbreviations was not supported by the study’s findings. Fang and his colleagues anticipated that younger individuals, given their heavy engagement in texting and social media, would be more accepting of abbreviations.

However, the age-related results were mixed. Younger participants, who generally use more abbreviations, were not necessarily enthusiastic about receiving them. “Even though younger users do frequently interact with abbreviations, that doesn’t mean they enjoy receiving them, especially in personal or significant discussions,” Fang points out. “The perception that abbreviations lessen the emotional effort involved in the message was consistent across age demographics.”

This challenges a widespread stereotype in digital communication, suggesting that frequent users of abbreviations do not necessarily have a favorable view of them in return.

—

### When to Use Abbreviations

While the research underscores the detrimental effects of abbreviations in contexts that require deeper interaction, not every situation is equally impacted. David Fang emphasizes the importance of context.

“In low-stakes conversations or practical interactions where there’s less expectation of personal connection, using abbreviations may be more appropriate,” Fang explains. “For instance, when communicating with a delivery driver, it might be reasonable to use abbreviations and accept a somewhat less sincere perception.”

The study advises consideration of the relationship type when deciding whether to abbreviate. Intimate relationships or emotionally significant discussions call for more effort, as fully spelling out words conveys a sense of sincerity and commitment. Conversely, in quick, functional exchanges or light chats with acquaintances, abbreviations may still find their place.

—

### Conclusion:

This pioneering research sheds light on the subtle nuances of digital communication and the unintended impressions that brevity can convey. The findings encourage individuals to pause before opting to abbreviate, particularly in dialogues that demand a stronger connection.

While abbreviating messages with terms like “IDK” or “TBH” may facilitate quick communication, the potential detriment to sincerity and the quality of relationships is important to contemplate.

—

#### Glossary of Terms:
– **Text Abbreviations**: Condensed versions of words or phrases utilized in electronic communication (e.g., IDK denotes “I don’t know”).
– **Digital Communication**: Transmission of information through electronic devices and online platforms, including texting or social media.
– **Social Bonds**: Connections and relationships established between individuals that promote trust and emotional ties.
– **Perceived Sincerity**: The degree to which an individual is seen as genuine or authentic in their communication.

—

#### Test Your Knowledge: