The Increasing Trend of Considering Dogs as Family Members or Children

The Increasing Trend of Considering Dogs as Family Members or Children


As Birth Rates Decrease, “Fur Babies” Are On The Rise: Why Millions Are Now Considering Dogs As Their Children

With global birth rates dropping at unprecedented levels, an unexpected family trend is gaining traction globally: more and more individuals are treating their dogs as “fur babies.” From extravagant birthday celebrations and personalized diets to social media accounts showcasing matching wardrobes, dogs have transcended their role as mere pets and are viewed by many as integral members of the family.

What is fueling this emotional elevation of our canine companions? What insights does this provide regarding modern society’s redefinition of interpersonal relationships, caregiving, and family structures?

Recent research from Eötvös Loránd University in Hungary offers insights into the expanding “fur baby” trend, highlighting a combination of psychological, social, and biological factors that clarify why people are turning to their dogs to fulfill nurturing roles customarily associated with children.

The Fur Baby Trend By The Numbers

The statistics highlight a significant cultural transformation in our approach to parenting and companionship. In Europe, approximately 25% to 50% of households now have at least one dog. For many, these pets are not merely part of the household; they are treated akin to children.

Simultaneously, the global fertility rate has decreased from 5.3 births per woman in 1963 to a mere 2.3 in 2023. In Hungary, 87.5% of adults reportedly spend less than an hour each week in the company of children. Surprisingly, 16% of Hungarian dog owners regard their pets as their children, a statistic that reaches nearly 37% among specific demographic subsets.

Researchers suggest that dogs may represent a “fulfilling compromise.” They enable individuals to fulfill their innate human desire to form attachments with dependents—without the considerable financial, emotional, and time commitments that come with raising children.

Why Dogs Are Ideal Substitutes

Dogs are not arbitrary substitutes for human offspring—they are neurologically and behaviorally suited for such roles.

Research indicates that dogs have cognitive abilities resembling those of 2- to 2.5-year-old children. They can decode human emotions via facial cues, respond to gestures such as pointing, and display empathetic behaviors toward their owners—an effect known as emotional contagion.

Additionally, their physical features contribute to this phenomenon. Popular small dog breeds like French bulldogs, pugs, and Shih Tzus exhibit neotenic (youthful) characteristics—large eyes, round faces, and expressive expressions—that evoke caretaking instincts in humans. These traits are not coincidental; they result from selective breeding designed to amplify their child-like charm.

Furthermore, today’s urban dogs frequently experience environments that resemble those of young children. Their owners dictate their movements, meal choices, and social interactions. Similar to toddlers, household dogs depend almost entirely on humans to navigate their surroundings.

Attachment Underpinned By Science

In addition to behavioral parallels, the emotional connection between dogs and their humans is supported by robust scientific evidence.

Studies employing modified child psychology assessments show that dogs, much like infants, view their owners as a “secure base”—turning to them for comfort in stressful times and seeking reassurance during new experiences. This attachment theory, originally articulated by psychologists for human relationships, now applies seamlessly to our canine companions.

Neuroimaging studies indicate that brain areas activated in mothers when gazing at their child also illuminate when they observe their dog. Oxytocin, the “love hormone” that fosters bonding between parents and children, also surges during interactions between dogs and their owners—on both sides of the leash.

Not Quite Children—But Almost

Despite the profound emotional connections, most people still recognize a fundamental ethical distinction between dogs and human children. As indicated by Laura Gillet, lead author of the Hungarian study, “In life-or-death situations, most individuals still prioritize human lives over even their dearest pets.”

This differentiation may be somewhat practical. Dogs generally have significantly shorter lifespans, and the long-term responsibilities of dog ownership are less daunting compared to raising a child, which includes funding education, planning for university, and more.

The dynamics of dog “parenting” also evolve over time. A puppy may serve as a young couple’s “pre-child,” a furry addition to a burgeoning family, or a devoted companion during an empty nest phase. Such roles enable dogs to adapt to various lifestyle phases without necessitating the lifelong commitment tied to parenthood.

Critically Evaluating the Fur Baby Trend

While the increasing overlap between pet ownership and parenting may seem innocuous or heartwarming, it is not devoid of complexities.

Selective breeding aimed at amplifying “adorable” traits has led to significant health issues in brachycephalic (flat-faced) breeds, such as respiratory problems and heightened vulnerability to illnesses. Veterinarians warn against this trend, advocating for prioritizing animal welfare over mere appearance.

Moreover, overly treating dogs like human infants—carrying them around, dressing them up,