Numerous dog owners examine their own eating habits for their impact on the climate, yet they mindlessly fill their dogs’ bowls with premium food. This disconnect is more significant than many people comprehend. Researchers from the University of Edinburgh and the University of Exeter discovered that dogs consuming meat-heavy diets can produce a higher dietary carbon footprint than their human owners.
The team studied nearly 1,000 dog foods available in the UK and revealed a shocking variation. The highest-impact products produced 65 times more emissions compared to the lowest-rated foods. While both can satisfy a dog’s nutritional requirements, they exist at divergent points on the climate impact scale. The main issue lies with prime meat, the same high-quality cuts that might otherwise be consumed by humans. Foods that utilize nutritious leftover carcass parts or by-products not desired for human consumption help in maintaining a lower environmental impact.
In total, ingredients used in dog food in the UK represent roughly one percent of the nation’s overall greenhouse gas emissions. Although that may seem modest, it parallels emissions from complete economic sectors. When the researchers extrapolated their findings on a global scale, the implications became even more alarming. Supplying enough food of the types presently consumed by UK dogs for the world’s 700 million dogs could generate emissions comparable to more than half of those produced by commercial aviation each year.
The Hidden Cost of Premium Trends
The research team employed an advanced model to deconstruct recipes by analyzing nutrient labels and ingredient lists. Their results indicate that “premium” does not equate to environmentally friendly. Dry dog food that contains grains typically has a significantly lower environmental impact than wet, raw, or grain-free options. As pet ownership increases and owners lean towards diets that feature human-grade meat while discarding grains, we are unintentionally heightening our pets’ carbon pawprints.
“As a veterinary surgeon focused on environmental sustainability, I frequently observe owners caught between viewing dogs as meat-eating ‘wolves’ and their desire to lessen environmental damage. Our research illustrates just how vast and variable the climate impact of dog food truly is.” – John Harvey, University of Edinburgh
The study underscores a distinct trade-off. Foods advertised as grain-free, wet, or raw consistently showed higher emissions than conventional dry kibble. For those owners hesitant to replace their dog’s steak with soy, a compromise exists. Reviewing labels for types of meat cuts and choosing foods with lower prime meat levels can yield positive changes without altering the dog’s favored food type.
What Labels Don’t Tell You
Present labels can be ambiguous, complicating the task for even the most well-meaning owners to discern the exact type of meat contained in the bag. The researchers advocate for improved transparency within the pet food sector. Enhanced labeling and a move towards ingredients that do not compete with human food supplies are critical for a sustainable future.
Plant-based dog foods have shown potential for minimizing emissions, though only a limited number were available for examination. In practical terms, feeding dogs transcends mere protein percentages or marketing claims. It involves making choices between ingredients that subtly influence emissions positively or negatively. Determining whether a food relies primarily on prime meat or on less sought-after carcass parts can lead to a significant impact. For many homes, the uncomfortable but clear takeaway is this: the most effective strategy to reduce a pet’s environmental footprint may simply be reverting to the basics—opting for a dependable bag of dry kibble that utilizes the entire animal.
[Journal of Cleaner Production: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.147277](https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2025.147277)
There’s no paywall here
If our reporting has informed or inspired you, please consider making a donation. Every contribution, no matter the size, empowers us to continue delivering accurate, engaging, and trustworthy science and medical news. Independent journalism requires time, effort, and resources—your support ensures we can keep uncovering the stories that matter most to you.
Join us in making knowledge accessible and impactful. Thank you for standing with us!